When comparing bronze, fiberglass, and plastic sculptures in terms of environmental impact, each material has distinct advantages and drawbacks. Bronze, a traditional medium, is highly durable and can last centuries, reducing the need for replacements. However, its production involves mining and high energy consumption, contributing to carbon emissions.

Fiberglass, while lighter and less energy-intensive to produce, often contains resins and chemicals that can be harmful if not disposed of properly. Its lifespan is shorter than bronze, leading to more frequent replacements and waste.

Plastic sculptures are the least eco-friendly option. Derived from petroleum, plastic production emits significant greenhouse gases, and its non-biodegradable nature leads to long-term pollution. While recycling is possible, many plastic artworks end up in landfills.

For sustainability, bronze may be preferable due to its longevity, but recycled or low-impact alternatives in fiberglass and bioplastics are emerging as greener choices for modern artists. Choosing locally sourced materials or repurposed metals can further reduce environmental harm.

Ultimately, the eco-friendliest option depends on production methods, lifespan, and end-of-life disposal. Artists and collectors should weigh these factors to make environmentally conscious decisions.