The market reception of politically charged versus neutral porcelain sculptures varies significantly due to differing collector preferences, cultural sensitivities, and investment motivations. Politically charged porcelain sculptures often spark intense reactions—some collectors seek them for their provocative statements, while others avoid them due to potential controversy. These pieces may attract niche buyers, including activists or historians, but face resistance in conservative markets.

Neutral porcelain sculptures, on the other hand, appeal to a broader audience. Their timeless, apolitical themes—such as nature, abstract forms, or classical figures—make them safer investments for galleries and private collectors. They dominate mainstream markets, particularly in regions where political art risks censorship or backlash.

Ultimately, politically charged works thrive in avant-garde circles but face limited commercial scalability, while neutral sculptures enjoy consistent demand. Collectors of controversial pieces often prioritize ideological alignment over resale value, whereas neutral art buyers focus on aesthetic and long-term market stability.